Resident Perceptions and Confidence Regarding Pediatric Preventive Care

Purpose of Study: Residents have experienced changes in educational structure, format, content, and patient experience due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Resident physicians across the country have reported changes in workload including a decrease in well child checks and immunizations resulting in limited clinical exposure. This study aimed to assess the confidence of first year pediatric residents (interns) in conducting routine preventive screening for children and to identify potential gaps in knowledge among this cohort. Methods Used: We conducted a cross-sectional observation study that included 13 categorical first year pediatric residents. A voluntary, anonymous online survey was administered in September 2022. The survey assessed confidence levels, and perceived comfort regarding common preventive pediatric encounters and screening tools. The survey included 7-questions based on the 4th Edition Bright Future's Guidelines and respondents rated their answers on a 5-point Likert scale. The surveys were distributed anonymously via e-mail using Survey Monkey, a web-based software platform that provided an intuitive interface for validated data capture. Participants were given 2 weeks to complete the survey and reminders were sent via email. Summary of Results: Eight of 13 interns participated for a response rate of 62%. Sixty-three percent of the residents had completed a subinternship in pediatrics. Of our respondents, 75% reported feeling "not at all confident" in executing well child check-ups for children <12months old and 63% reported feeling "very confident" in examining children> 13months old. Regarding the ability to perform a genitourinary examination in children >12years of age, 63% of respondents stated that they were "slightly" or "not at all confident". We asked interns to rate their confidence in providing anticipatory guidance to their patients. Interns perceived being somewhat confident regarding guidance about safe sex, tobacco use, and healthy lifestyles but less confident regarding newborn care, breast feeding and infant nutrition. Nearly 40% reported comfort in recommending and advising parents about the risks and benefits of age appropriate immunizations. We asked residents to report their ability in administering and interpreting screening tools (ASQ, MCAT, EPDS). Interns reported that were able to interpret results but lacked confidence in providing guidance. Conclusion(s): Our study identifies opportunities to bridge experiential knowledge gaps and confidence among pediatric interns who may have had limited clinical exposure to pediatrics following the COVID-19 pandemic. Graduate medical education programs should consider developing tailored educational interventions specifically geared for identified learning gaps to mitigate the challenges posed by the pandemic.

COVID-19 in pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium: The CRONOS registry.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease that can lead to severe respiratory symptoms. Pregnant women have an increased risk for a severe course. Therefore, the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) Guidelines 015/092 "SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium" were established to standardize care in the COVID-19 pandemic. The guideline group used data from the "COVID-19 related obstetrics and neonatal outcome study" (CRONOS) to generate evidence-based recommendations for action. CRONOS collects data from more than 130 affiliated maternity hospitals nationwide in Germany. According to the study, pregnant women positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are often asymptomatic;however, in 1 out of 25 detected infections there is a severe course requiring intensive medical treatment. Thromboembolism occurs in 1 out of 30 women hospitalized for COVID-19. An infection of the neonate of a mother infected peripartum is occasionally detected (about 1 out of 20 infants) and usually remains without consequence in the short-term outcome. Many other questions have been answered using CRONOS data. The registry is still open and recruiting and will also provide more in-depth information on different virus variants and vaccination in the future with more than 6000 cases. CRONOS is exemplary for an unprecedented cooperation of gynecologists during the pandemic.Copyright © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

A Quality Improvement Initiative on sustaining Kangaroo Mother Care Practices During COVID Pandemic

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic has affected the KMC practices in our SNCU. Lack of clear guidelines and training about continuing KMC in COVID-19 times has further lead to decrease in KMC practices. Method(s): This is a prospective single centered quality improvement study conducted in the inborn unit of a tertiary care hospital. Intervention phase was done in August and September 2020. Preterm mother-infant dyads who were admitted in the inborn Level 2 Neonatal care unit with birth weight less than 2000 grams were enrolled in this study. A QI team comprising of resident doctors, nurses and supporting staff and a lactation counsellor was formed. The potential barriers for prolonged KMC were evaluated using fish bone analysis. A variety of measures were introduced and subsequently tested by seven plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. Data on percentage of initiation of KMC was measured by bedside nurses on daily basis and the data was plotted on run chart every week during implementation phase. Result(s): 116 eligible mother-infant dyads were studied during implementation period (50 days). We achieved our goal by step-wise implementation of changes through multiple PDSA cycles. The percentage of initiation of KMC among eligible preterm infants has increased from baseline of 43.4% to 83.3% and duration of KMC from 1.5 mean hours to 4.5 hours over a period of eight weeks. Conclusion(s): Ongoing quality improvement measures increased the percentage of initiation and duration of KMC among eligible preterm infants without addition of extra man power.Copyright © 2022 by author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY NC ).

Implementation of a Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Program for Management of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy, a Quality Improvement Study, in British Columbia, Canada

Background & Purpose: Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) in pregnant women is common, but uncertainty exists on utilization of home blood pressure (BP) readings for management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). We conducted a qualitative improvement study to understand how physicians utilize HBPM for pregnant patients and patient acceptability. Method(s): Pregnant patients with risk factors for HDP were recruited. Participants were provided with a validated home BP monitor (Microlife Watch BP) and monitored their BP two times in the morning/evening and manually entered data into a paper diary. Obstetrical Medicine physicians completed written survey after each clinic visit to understand how they used HBPM. Surveys were sent to all participants to assess acceptability of HBPM. Result(s): In total, 103 women were recruited for the study, of which, 43% were enrolled antepartum (mean age 34+/-5 years;mean gestation 171+/-61 days) and 57% postpartum (mean age 35+/-6 years;mean days postpartum 6+/-4 days). Median compliance with home BP readings was 0.94 (IQR 0.57, 1.00). Obstetrical Medicine physicians relied on the range of HBPM readings (70%) to make clinical decisions for management of HDP. Antepartum, 13% of clinic visits resulted in an increase of antihypertensive medications, and 82% required no change in medication. Post-partum, 44% of visits required a decrease anti-hypertensive medication. 98% of participants found HBPM easy to do, and 51% were able to strictly adhere to their measurement schedule. Barriers to HBPM included newborn care (57%), forgetting to check (39%), and lack of time in the mornings (35%). Conclusion(s): HBPM to manage HDP is acceptable to patients and can be safely used to manage HDP ante-partum and post-partum. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and increasing demand for virtual healthcare visits, further studies are need to assess the effectiveness of HBPM on management of HDP.

Maternal COVID-19 Infection: A Cause of Neonatal Stroke?

Perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (PAIS) is a rare cause of neonatal seizures, with an incidence of 1 in 2500 to 4000 live births, globally. This is a case of a neonate with PAIS due to transpla-cental passage of COVID-19 IgG antibodies from the mother. A term, male neonate, born to a primigravida with an unevent-ful antenatal history was presented on the second day of life with multiple episodes of focal clonic seizures involving the right upper and lower limbs. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an acute infarct in the left frontal lobe, extending into the parietal region, anterior limb, and genu of internal capsule suggestive of arterial ischemic stroke. The known causes of PAIS were evaluated and ruled out. The result of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis for SARS-CoV-2 antigen was negative for both the mother and the neonate. COVID-19 IgG antibodies in the mother and neonate were elevated. Seizures were controlled with antiepileptics. The neonate had no further seizure episodes and was discharged on oral levetiracetam. The infant was developmentally and neurologically normal at 3 months of age. PAIS is a rare cause of neonatal seizures, and maternal COVID-19 infection may be associated with neonatal stroke.Copyright © 2022, Himalaya Wellness Company. All rights reserved.

Women's experiences and views on early breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: quantitative and qualitative findings from the IMAgiNE EURO study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about women's experience of care and views on early breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway. METHODS: Women (n = 2922) who gave birth in a facility in Norway between March 2020 and June 2021 were invited to answer an online questionnaire based on World Health Organization (WHO) Standard-based quality measures, exploring their experiences of care and views on early breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic. To examine associations between year of birth (2020, 2021) and early breastfeeding-related factors, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multiple logistic regression. Qualitative data were analysed using Systematic Text Condensation. RESULTS: Compared to the first year of the pandemic (2020), women who gave birth in 2021 reported higher odds of experiencing adequate breastfeeding support (adjOR 1.79; 95% CI 1.35, 2.38), immediate attention from healthcare providers when needed (adjOR 1.89; 95% CI 1.49, 2.39), clear communication from healthcare providers (adjOR 1.76; 95% CI 1.39, 2.22), being allowed companion of choice (adjOR 1.47; 95% CI 1.21, 1.79), adequate visiting hours for partner (adjOR 1.35; 95% CI 1.09, 1.68), adequate number of healthcare providers (adjOR 1.24; 95% CI 1.02, 1.52), and adequate professionalism of the healthcare providers (adjOR 1.65; 95% CI 1.32, 2.08). Compared to 2020, in 2021 we found no difference in skin-to-skin contact, early breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding at discharge, adequate number of women per room, or women's satisfaction. In their comments, women described understaffed postnatal wards, early discharge and highlighted the importance of breastfeeding support, and concerns about long-term consequences such as postpartum depression. CONCLUSIONS: In the second year of the pandemic, WHO Standard-based quality measures related to breastfeeding improved for women giving birth in Norway compared to the first year of the pandemic. Women's general satisfaction with care during COVID-19 did however not improve significantly from 2020 to 2021. Compared to pre-pandemic data, our findings suggest an initial decrease in exclusive breastfeeding at discharge during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway with little difference comparing 2020 versus 2021. Our findings should alert researchers, policy makers and clinicians in postnatal care services to improve future practices.

COVID-19 pandemic and neonatal health: What we know so far?

COVID-19 first time appeared in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. The number of cases increased rapidly in china and outside and the World Health Organization declared a pandemic on 11th March 2020. The pregnant and postpartum women, child, and neonatal populations are vulnerable to this disease due to immunological and physiological changes. This paper analyzed the published evidence for assessing the effect of COVID-19 on neonatal health and health care. Online published literature was searched from PubMed, Google Scholar, and other official webpages using keywords: "coronavirus/COVID-19/new coronavirus 2019"/SARS-CoV-2 and neonatal health/care/outcomes" and reviewed to prepare this article. COVID-19 is the potential to transmit either mother to fetus or mother/caregiver to neonates. However, neonates born from infected mothers did not show significant clinical features. Pharyngeal-swab, amniotic-fluid, cord-blood, and breast-milk test results were not found positive. Health facility-based vaginal/caesarian delivery was considered a low risk of transmission. However, recommended to separate neonates with infected mothers/caregivers and test immediately after birth to avoid the possible transmission. Mothers/caregivers should take routine preventive measures such as washing hands frequently and avoiding contact with infected people. If neonates suffered from the server acute respiratory distress requires intensive care urgently. Despite the possibility of the intrauterine transmission of COVID-19 direct evidence is still lacking so it needs more studies for further confirmation. The International Pediatric Association suggested preventive programs, curative care, vaccination, and telemedicine care as the minimum services and called on its members to address these cares during the pandemic. Copyright © 2020, Kathmandu University. All rights reserved.

The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The national health care response to coronavirus (COVID-19) has varied between countries. The United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) have comparable maternity and neonatal care systems, and experienced similar numbers of COVID-19 infections, but had different organisational responses to the pandemic. Understanding why and how similarities and differences occurred in these two contexts could inform optimal care in normal circumstances, and during future crises. AIM: To compare the UK and Dutch COVID-19 maternity and neonatal care responses in three key domains: choice of birthplace, companionship, and families in vulnerable situations. METHOD: A multi-method study, including documentary analysis of national organisation policy and guidance on COVID-19, and interviews with national and regional stakeholders. FINDINGS: Both countries had an infection control focus, with less emphasis on the impact of restrictions, especially for families in vulnerable situations. Differences included care providers' fear of contracting COVID-19; the extent to which community- and personalised care was embedded in the care system before the pandemic; and how far multidisciplinary collaboration and service-user involvement were prioritised. CONCLUSION: We recommend that countries should 1) make a systematic plan for crisis decision-making before a serious event occurs, and that this must include authentic service-user involvement, multidisciplinary collaboration, and protection of staff wellbeing 2) integrate women's and families' values into the maternity and neonatal care system, ensuring equitable inclusion of the most vulnerable and 3) strengthen community provision to ensure system wide resilience to future shocks from pandemics, or other unexpected large-scale events.

Regional differences in the quality of maternal and neonatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth across Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics 2 (NUTS-II) regions in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Women participating in the cross-sectional IMAgiNE EURO study who gave birth in Portugal from March 1, 2020, to October 28, 2021, completed a structured questionnaire with 40 key WHO standards-based quality measures. Four domains of QMNC were assessed: (1) provision of care; (2) experience of care; (3) availability of human and physical resources; and (4) reorganizational changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Frequencies for each quality measure within each QMNC domain were computed overall and by region. RESULTS: Out of 1845 participants, one-third (33.7%) had a cesarean. Examples of high-quality care included: low frequencies of lack of early breastfeeding and rooming-in (8.0% and 7.7%, respectively) and informal payment (0.7%); adequate staff professionalism (94.6%); adequate room comfort and equipment (95.2%). However, substandard practices with large heterogeneity across regions were also reported. Among women who experienced labor, the percentage of instrumental vaginal births ranged from 22.3% in the Algarve to 33.5% in Center; among these, fundal pressure ranged from 34.8% in Lisbon to 66.7% in Center. Episiotomy was performed in 39.3% of noninstrumental vaginal births with variations between 31.8% in the North to 59.8% in Center. One in four women reported inadequate breastfeeding support (26.1%, ranging from 19.4% in Algarve to 31.5% in Lisbon). One in five reported no exclusive breastfeeding at discharge (22.1%; 19.5% in Lisbon to 28.2% in Algarve). CONCLUSION: Urgent actions are needed to harmonize QMNC and reduce inequities across regions in Portugal.

Women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care in childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia, comparing the years 2020 and 2021, among women who went into labor or had a prelabor cesarean. METHODS: Women giving birth in healthcare facilities in Latvia from March 1, 2020, to October 28, 2021, answered an online questionnaire including 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. Descriptive and multivariate quantile regression analyses were performed to compare QMNC in 2020 and 2021. RESULTS: 2079 women were included in the analysis: 1860 women who went into labor (group 1) and 219 with prelabor cesarean (group 2). Among group 1, 66.4% (n = 99/149) of women received fundal pressure in an instrumental vaginal birth, 43.5% (n = 810) lacked involvement in choices, 17.4% (n = 317) reported suffering abuse, 32.7% (n = 609) reported inadequate breastfeeding support while 5.2% (n = 96) lack of early breastfeeding. A significant reduction in QMNC due to the COVID-19 pandemic was reported by 29.5% (n = 219) and 25.0% (n = 270) of respondents in 2020 and 2021, respectively (P = 0.045). Multivariate analyses highlighted a significantly lower QMNC index for 2020 compared with 2021 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This first study investigating QMNC in Latvia showed significant gaps in QMNC perceived by respondents, with slightly better results in 2021. Appropriate healthcare strategies to improve health care for women and newborns in Latvia are required. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier:NCT04847336.

Barriers and enablers of breastfeeding in mother-newborn dyads in institutional settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study across seven government hospitals of Delhi, India.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted newborn care and breastfeeding practices across most healthcare facilities. We undertook this study to explore the barriers and enablers for newborn care and breastfeeding practices in hospitals in Delhi, India for recently delivered mother (RDM)-newborn dyads during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) and inductively design a "pathway of impaction" for informing mitigatory initiatives during the current and future pandemics, at least in the initial months. Materials and methods: We used an exploratory descriptive design (qualitative research method) and collected information from seven leading public health facilities in Delhi, India. We conducted separate interviews with the head and senior faculty from the Departments of Pediatrics/Neonatology (n = 12) and Obstetrics (n = 7), resident doctors (n = 14), nurses (labor room/maternity ward; n = 13), and RDMs (n = 45) across three profiles: (a) COVID-19-negative RDM with healthy newborn (n = 18), (b) COVID-19-positive RDM with healthy newborn (n = 19), and (c) COVID-19 positive RDM with sick newborn needing intensive care (n = 8) along with their care-giving family members (n = 39). We analyzed the data using grounded theory as the method and phenomenology as the philosophy of our research. Results: Anxiety among clients and providers, evolving evidence and advisories, separation of the COVID-positive RDM from her newborn at birth, providers' tendency to minimize contact duration and frequency with COVID-positive mothers, compromised counseling on breastfeeding, logistic difficulties in expression and transportation of COVID-positive mother's milk to her baby in the nursery, COVID restrictions, staff shortage and unavailable family support in wards and nursery, and inadequate infrastructure were identified as major barriers. Keeping the RDM-newborn together, harmonization of standard operating procedures between professional associations and within and between departments, strategic mobilization of resources, optimization of human resources, strengthening client-provider interaction, risk triaging, leveraging technology, and leadership-in-crisis-situations were notable enablers. Conclusion: The separation of the RDM and newborn led to a cascade of disruptions to newborn care and breastfeeding practices in the study institutions. Separating the newborn from the mother should be avoided during public health emergencies unless there is robust evidence favoring the same; routine institutional practices should be family centered.

Implementation of a community-based referral project to improve access to emergency obstetric and newborn care in Rohingya population during COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh

Introduction The delay in seeking emergency obstetric care leads to significant maternal morbidity and mortality and can worsen during pandemics, especially in humanitarian conflict settings with low uptake of obstetric services. To mitigate the challenges related to the second delay caused by lack of transport in the COVID-19 pandemic, the organisation United Nations Population Fund implements a community-based referral project called Referral Hub in the Rohingya refugee population in Bangladesh. The objective of the paper is to describe the implementation process of the Referral hub and present clients' utilisation and perception of the service. Methods Findings from part of a larger mixed-method study, the analysis of the standard operating protocol of the intervention, secondary data of routine utilisation of the 12 referral hubs between January and August 2020, 21 key informant interviews and a community survey among 100 pregnant women are presented in this paper. Results The findings show an increasing trend in the referral hub utilisation and a strong recommendation of the service. Conclusion Due to a robust referral mechanism by collaborating with the community and engaging accessible and free of cost transport service, the intervention has high potential to improve access to facility care in low-resource and humanitarian contexts, especially during pandemics. Copyright ©

Discuss and Share Experiences in Implementing FCC Models in University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital (HKU-SZH)

Aim: To discuss and share experiences in implementing Family centered care (FCC) models in Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital (HKU-SZH). Met hods: At present, FCC has not been wel l implemented in China and most NICU adopt closed management. Since December 2013, our department has introduced the FCC concept and implemented 24-hour opening ward, providing family members with a series of services including ward rounds, progressive health education, palliative care, breast-feeding, cold chain support of breast milk, breast milk bank, family visit, followup after discharge, and mutual support group for family members. The above services were maintained during the COVID-19 period. Results: 10,615 newborns were treated from December 2013 to December 2020, the minimum gestational age of preterm infants treated successfully was 22+6 weeks and the minimum weight was 500g. The patient satisfaction rate in 2020 was 99.9%, and the average breastfeeding rate in 2020 was 84% while 83.4% of full-term infants and 90.2% of premature infants were breast-fed. (A multi-center survey of 974 cases of nutrition-related status of preterm infants in NICU in China reported that 13.6% of preterm infants were breast-fed during 2005-2006) The nosocomial infection rate from 2014 to 2020 was controlled between 0.41% and 2.02%. Literature showed that the incidence rate of nosocomial infection in neonatal care units of 17 grade A general hospitals in China from 2013 to 2014 was 3.35%. Conclusion: An open NICU based on the FCC concept is feasible and contributes to increased breastfeeding rates and patient satisfaction without increasing the incidence of nosocomial infections.

Evaluation of capacity to deliver emergency obstetrics and newborn care updated midwifery and reproductive health training curricula in Kenya: Before and after study

Introduction: Provision of emergency obstetric and newborn care (EmONC) by skilled health personnel reduces maternal and newborn mortality. Pre-service diploma midwifery and clinical medicine (reproductive health) curricula in Kenya were reviewed and updated integrating the competency based EmONC curriculum. A two-part (virtual for theoretical component and face-to-face for the skills-based component) capacity building workshop for national midwifery/clinical medicine trainers of trainers to improve their capacity to implement the updated curricula and cascade it to colleagues nationwide was conducted. Purpose: This paper measured change in confidence of pre-service midwifery/clinical medicine educators to deliver the updated competency-based curricula in Kenya. Methods: A before-after study among 51 midwifery/clinical medicine educators from 35 training colleges who participated in upskilling workshops as trainers-of-trainers for the updated curricula between September-November 2020. Assessment included self-reported confidence using a 3-point Likert scale (not confident, somewhat confident or extremely confident) in facilitating online teaching (as COVID-19 pandemic containment measure), EmONC skills teaching/demonstration;scenario/simulation teaching, small group discussions, peer review and giving effective feedback. Analysis involved test of proportions with p-values < 0.05 statistically significant. Results: Educators’ confidence significantly improved in facilitating virtual teaching (46% to 70%, p = 0.0082). On the competency-based training, the confidence among educators significantly increased in facilitating EmONC skills teaching/demonstration (44% to 96%), facilitating scenario/simulation teaching (46% to 92%), facilitating small group discussions (46% to 94%), giving effective feedback (46% to 92%), and peer review and feedback (47% to 77%), p < 0.05). Conclusion: The blended training improved the confidence of pre-service educators to deliver the updated midwifery/clinical medicine curricula.

INFANTS WITH HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA PRESENTING TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT IN THE COVID-19 ERA

Purpose of Study Amidst the COVID 19 pandemic, hospitals implemented changes in labor and delivery practice, including limiting maternal and neonatal length of stay. A key aspect of neonatal care during the first few days of life is trending bilirubin. Modifications in newborn length of stay may lead to premature infant discharge before bilirubin rises enough to require phototherapy. The purpose of this study is to determine if there was a significant increase in the number of neonates presenting to our Emergency Department and admitted for hyperbilirubinemia in the COVID 19 era. Methods Used A retrospective chart review of infants 0-7 days old presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with jaundice from March 01-November 01 of 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 was completed. Data collected included gestational age, day of life (DOL) at presentation, peak serum bilirubin level, presence of hyperbilirubinemia and neurotoxic risk factors, and length of stay (LOS). Chi square and t-tests determined differences between the study periods. Logistic regression was used to describe associations between COVID era and management of hyperbilirubinemia after adjusting for gestational age and peak serum bilirubin. Summary of Results Our analysis included 209 infants, 144 from the pre-pandemic period (48/year) and 65 after the onset of the pandemic. There was a statistically significant increase in the number of infants presenting to the ED with hyperbilirubinemia in the COVID era (p=0.04, table 1). A larger proportion of infants presenting with hyperbilirubinemia were admitted in the COVID era (41% vs 20%, p=0.001). A higher percentage of patients had a LOS of 2 or more days in the COVID era as compared to pre-pandemic (21.5% vs 6.3%, p=0.001). After adjusting for gestational age or peak serum bilirubin, infants presenting to the ED with hyperbilirubinemia had higher odds of being admitted (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5-5.2) and having a LOS of 2 or more days (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.5-9.9). Conclusions Our study indicates that the number of patients presenting to the emergency department with hyperbilirubinemia in the first week of life increased following the onset of the pandemic. These patients had a higher likelihood of admission and longer length of stay compared to pre-pandemic visits. While some of these results may be attributable to earlier post-partum discharge, this was not due to variations in gestational age or peak bilirubin levels. Further studies show examine causes for these changes, particularly around decisions to admit infants with hyperbilirubinemia and the inability to perform home nursing visits during the early days of the pandemic. (Table Presented).

DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2 IN STOOL BUT NOT NARES OF NEWBORNS OF MOTHERS WITH COVID-19 DURING PREGNANCY

Purpose of Study To investigate potential evidence of in utero transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the stool of newborns born to mothers with COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. Methods Used We investigated stool from 1 day to 2 months of age from 14 newborns born at 25-41 weeks whose mothers had COVID-19 during pregnancy. Newborns were admitted at delivery to the NICU or newborn nursery of our urban academic hospital from July 2020 to May 2021. A comparison group of 30 newborns had similar GAs and were born to mothers without COVID-19 during pregnancy. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was quantified with quantitative PCR using primers against SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein and non-structural protein 14 (NSP-14), spike protein with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and inflammatory cytokines interleukin- 6 (IL-6) and interferon-g (IFN-γ) elicited by stool homogenates in mouse bone marrow macrophages. This study was IRB approved with parental consent. Summary of Results Despite negative nasal PCRs from all newborns, viral RNAs and spike protein were detected in the stool of 11 out of 14 newborns as early as the first day of life (range 0-2 months, figure 2A and 2B). Stool RNA and spike protein levels increased over time in 2 and 4 newborns, respectively. Stool homogenates from all newborns elicited elevated inflammatory cytokines, IL-6 and IFN-γ, from mouse macrophages (figure 1). Most newborns were clinically well except for one death from gestational autoimmune liver disease and one with necrotizing enterocolitis. Conclusions These novel findings suggest risk of in utero SARS-CoV-2 transmission to the premature and term fetal intestine during gestation despite negative postnatal nasal PCRs. It is unclear if the presence of viral RNA and protein within the gut microbiome represents active virus in newborns with clinical hospital courses typical of their gestational age in 12 out of 14 cases. However, increasing levels of viral RNA and protein over time suggest replication in some infants, and their gut microbiome induced inflammation in mouse models. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and spike protein in the intestines of newborns may potentially impact development of the gut microbiome and the immune system and should be further investigated. (Figure Presented).

FACILITATING QI ACTIVITIES GLOBALLY THROUGH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY: DECREASING SEVERE NEONATAL HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA

Purpose of Study Severe Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia (SNH) is a major cause of neonatal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa and can cause neurodevelopmental disability in survivors. Exchange transfusions (ET) to reduce high bilirubin levels are common in low/middle income countries (LMIC) due to late detection of jaundice. Mothers are often discharged from hospital < 24 hours after delivery. A Blended Learning Quality Improvement (QI) Program using digital technology (the in- country workshop was cancelled due to COVID 19 pandemic) was developed between Georgetown University (GU) and district hospitals in Ghana to improve quality of neonatal care (funded by GU Global Health Initiative). The objective of this program was to facilitate QI activity at a Ghana District Hospital (GDH) promoting early care seeking in mothers for neonatal jaundice so that phototherapy may be used to decrease SNH and ET. Methods Used GU faculty used Zoom and WhatsApp platforms to work with GDH staff to facilitate formation of a QI team, implement interactive health education with videos by trained midwives for antenatal/post-partum mothers, initiate daily rounds by physicians in postnatal wards, promote community health nurses to call/visit mothers postnatally at home, and maintain data on pre-defined key outcome indicators. The goal was to reduce the proportion of inborn infants ≥ 34 weeks gestational age being brought to the neonatal unit with SNH (serum bilirubin levels ≥ 340umol/L or 20 mg/dL) by 15% within 3 months. The program was exempted from review by the GU IRB. Statistical analysis: Chi- square;Fisher exact test. Summary of Results From Oct 2019 to Jan 2020, 14 (28%) of 50 discharged infants were readmitted with SNH and 7 (14%) received ET. Figure 1 shows the trend graph of infants admitted with SNH and ET each month after the initiation of the QI project in Jan 2020. Table 1 shows the decline in SNH and ET in the 3 months post intervention as well as a significant sustained decline for 16 months. There was a significant increase in infants being brought in for bilirubin levels < 255umol/L after the intervention. Conclusions Despite internet connectivity problems, this digitally mediated QI project demonstrated success in reduction of SNH and ET in a district hospital in a LMIC. Regular review of trend graphs and repeated facilitation, implemented through low-cost digital technology, are effective in promoting QI activities and can be applied regionally and globally. The increase in infants being brought in for mild jaundice points to the need for objective methods of determining bilirubin levels in the community. (Figure Presented).

Effects of Maternal SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Neonatal Discharge Planning and Care: Exacerbation of Racial and Ethnic Healthcare Disparities

Background. SARS-CoV-2 has exacerbated healthcare disparities. Maine's population of 1.3 million is comprised of only 6% Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC);however, statewide 18% of SARS-CoV-2 infections have occurred in this group. This study examines newborn care inequities for infants born to mothers with SARS-CoV-2. Methods. This study was conducted at Maine Medical Center in Portland, the largest hospital in Maine. Maternal SARS-CoV-2 infections from March 15, 2020 through April 1, 2021 were identified by PCR near time of delivery. Cases were matched to uninfected women by date of delivery. Chart review was conducted assessing demographic and clinical characteristics, comparing SARS-CoV-2 exposed and unexposed infants. The subset of SARS-CoV-2 exposed infants was further analyzed for trends in care by race. Protocol was exempt by MaineHealth IRB. Results. Twenty four women and their infants were identified with maternal positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR just prior to delivery. An additional 24 unexposed infants were enrolled. When compared to unexposed infants, SARS-CoV-2 exposed were more likely to be racial minorities (63% vs 21%, p = 0.003), to have foreign-born mothers (58% vs 0.4%, p< 0.05) or to receive health care in a language other than English (29% vs 0.4%, p =0.02). For infants born to SARS-CoV-2 infected mothers, only 29% had initial follow up visit in person with their primary care provider (13% of BIPOC infants vs 56% of non-BIPOC infants, p = 0.03). Time to in-person follow up for exposed infants varied by race, with median time of 21 days (range 2-53 days) for racial minorities and 7.5 days (range 2-30 days) for non minorities. All families were discharged with a thermometer and scale for home management. No infants required re-admission during the month after discharge. One exposed infant tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends evaluation of newborns 3-5 days after discharge to identify maternal and child health factors affecting newborn well-being. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has made this challenging for patients, particularly for racial minorities. BIPOC pediatric patients were disproportionately affected by the pandemic in Maine, and were disproportionately affected by care discrepancies even when the infant was uninfected.

Variation in United States COVID-19 newborn care practices: results of an online physician survey.

BACKGROUND: Newborn care practices that best promote the health and well-being of mother-infant dyads after birth while minimizing transmission of COVID-19 were uncertain at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: Examine variation in COVID-19 newborn care practices among U.S. birth hospitals and by hospital characteristics (U.S. census region, highest level of neonatal level of care, and Baby-Friendly hospital status). STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed physicians via American Academy of Pediatrics email listservs and social media between 5/26/2020-6/8/2020. Physicians identified the birth hospital in which they provided newborn care and their hospital's approach to obstetrical and newborn care related to COVID-19. Chi-square tests were used to examine variation in hospital practices by U.S. census region, highest level of neonatal care, and Baby-Friendly hospital status. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty three physicians responded from 318 hospitals across 46 states. Variation in care of SARS-CoV-2 positive mother-infant dyads was greatest for approaches to location of newborn care (31% separation, 17% rooming-in, and 51% based on shared-decision making), early skin-to-skin care (48% prohibited/discouraged, 11% encouraged, and 40% based on shared-decision making) and direct breastfeeding (37% prohibited/discouraged, 15% encouraged, and 48% based on shared-decision making). Among presumed uninfected dyads, 59% of hospitals discharged at least some mother-infant dyads early. We found variation in practices by U.S. census region. CONCLUSION: Approaches to newborn care and breastfeeding support for mother-infant dyads with positive SARS-CoV-2 testing differed across U.S. birth hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Early discharge of presumed uninfected mother-infant dyads was common.

The Impacts of COVID-19 on US Maternity Care Practices: A Followup Study.

This article extends the findings of a rapid response article researched in April 2020 to illustrate how providers' practices and attitudes toward COVID-19 had shifted in response to better evidence, increased experience, and improved guidance on how SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 impacted maternity care in the United States. This article is based on a review of current labor and delivery guidelines in relation to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, and on an email survey of 28 community-based and hospital-based maternity care providers in the United State, who discuss their experiences and clients' needs in response to a rapidly shifting landscape of maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic. One-third of our respondents are obstetricians, while the other two-thirds include midwives, doulas, and labor and delivery nurses. We present these providers' frustrations and coping mechanisms in shifting their practices in relation to COVID-19. The primary lessons learned relate to improved testing and accessing PPE for providers and clients; the need for better integration between community- and hospital-based providers; and changes in restrictive protocols concerning labor support persons, rooming-in with newborns, immediate skin-to-skin contact, and breastfeeding. We conclude by suggesting that the COVID-19 pandemic offers a transformational moment to shift maternity care in the United States toward a more integrated and sustainable model that might improve provider and maternal experiences as well as maternal and newborn outcomes.